BoardSpace Case Study

August-September 2024

Overview: 

This case study is a project for the website, BoardSpace. BoardSpace offers nonprofit organizations a hub where members can store documents as well as keep track of meeting minutes and attendees.

The Challenge:

BoardSpace tasked my internship team with the responsibility of improving the agenda-builder feature on their website.

The Solution:

BoardSpace’s goal is to reduce friction while members use their agenda-builder feature. My internship team will accomplish this goal by conducting appropriate research, synthesizing the research and by making relevant suggestions for an easier, more intuitive onboarding experience.

My Role:

I conducted one of three usability tests with an existing user of BoardSpace, who tested my internship group’s prototype. After conducting the usability test, I synthesized and presented my findings to my group.

After meeting with our company contact, my group organized a list of opportunities, specific to the agenda-builder and corresponding goals to increase ease of use.

Opportunities:

  • Drag-and-drop feature is hard to use when there are a lot of sub-items

  • The content on the screen looks messy when it content is collapsed

  • User wants to drag multiple items at the same time

Usability Test:

My internship group’s company contact provided 3 current BoardSpace users to test our prototype, which was built after completing heuristic analysis of the current website.

Goals:

  • Make reordering easier to use for older and non-tech-savvy users

  • Features should be responsive and work well on smaller screens

  • Interface should look clean and intuitive

  • Cater design to current demographic (approximately 60 years old, be mindful of dexterity)

Current BoardSpace Agenda-Builder

BoardSpace Design Proposal

Current BoardSpace Agenda-Builder

Design Features: ability to attach document to meeting section, clear sub-item visibility, dropdown minute selection, slide-out “upload document” feature

Tasks:

The user was asked to complete a series of tasks during the usability test -

  • You want to add a title to the agenda - how would you do that?

  • You want to view the subitems of subitem #4.2 - how would you do that?

  • You want to add a new agenda item - how would you do that?

  • How would you allocate an amount of time to the newly added item?

  • You want to make Jane Smith the presenter for the item - how would you do this?

  • What do you think the little box next to the presenter’s name does? What do you think about this feature and how it works?

  • How would you add a comment to the agenda?

  • How would you add a new document to the agenda?

  • How would you add a title to the agenda?

Document Management

  • Users had difficulty understanding the icons present for downloading, removing, previewing documents in the portal

  • Users suggested using an eyeball icon rather than an arrow icon to preview document

Minutes Picker

  • Users preferred an input feature, rather than a drop-down feature to enter minutes as the current drop-down selection were in increments of 5. Users stated that some sections of meetings are less than 5 minutes.

Recommendations:

Based off of heuristic analysis and usability tests conducted, my internship team provided the following recommendations to BoardSpaceInc

  • Utilize hover tooltips to describe actions

  • Add a dialogue box with instructions for how to drag a document to a specific section of the meeting from the document drawer

  • Add thumbnails to documents for easy identification

  • Differentiate newly added items by labels or bold font

  • Change the drop-down list to an input feature so users can choose any minutes, rather than the increments of 5 that were options in the drop-down list

Key Insights:

Drag and Drop Feature

  • Users desired more exaggerated indentation between items and subitems

  • Users desired differentiation between active and non-active states

  • Users desired the “+” icon to be clearly labeled as “add item”

Add new item

  • Users anticipated seeing the "add new item” feature at the top of the screen, rather than the bottom

  • Users found it difficult to identify a newly added item, and wished for differentiation between an existing and newly added item, such as bold font

Previous
Previous

CityPups Case Study